11/ TECHNOLOGIES OF THE FUTURE
The attempt to predict the technologies of the future and the path humanity will take may initially seem nonsensical, unrealistic, and result in highly inaccurate conclusions. After all, how can we "predict" the future when we clearly see that there are countless creative individuals among us, each theoretically capable of influencing the whole to such an extent that it diverts the current course of development (the Butterfly Effect)? Despite initial skepticism, in this article, I will attempt to outline potential paths for our journey and explain how it is possible, with relative accuracy (in fundamentals), to envision our future.
I am by no means the first to try to predict the future. History has introduced us to figures whose works are often considered prophetic. Personally, I was deeply impressed by Charlie Chaplin's film Modern Times. He depicted not only technology but also societal behavior in later times with remarkable accuracy. Coincidence? I don't think so. When predicting the future and future societal manifestations, it is necessary to base assumptions on the foundational principles of our world. By understanding these principles correctly, we can predict our trajectory. Every technology is based on the fundamentals of life. Every scientist and pioneer must be an attentive observer of nature and our world. Chaplin observed the world correctly, which allowed him to present a fairly accurate vision of the future in a comedic form.
In my project, I simplified all philosophies (ideologies) into two basic concepts:
- Individualism (Big Bang, random arrangement of the world, the law of the jungle, chaos...)
- Collectivism (a never-beginning and never-ending interconnected world).
How do we determine which concept is the correct one to rely on and which is merely illusory? Through observation and practice. When we observe the world from the correct perspective (through the right concept), new horizons open up to us. Simply put, we become more creative in our thinking. Philosophy is closely related to science. If an ideology limits or confines your thinking, the boundaries set will directly impact the accuracy of your scientific results.
In our world, we can observe both macro scales (planets, galaxies, the universe) and micro scales (cells, atoms, quarks). Modern science struggles to connect these two worlds. It appears that what applies in the macro world does not apply in the micro world and vice versa. Researchers have been forced to create multiple natural science disciplines (physics, chemistry, biology, etc.) to describe the observable world. Their problem lies in relying on an incorrect concept of thinking, adjusting constants in formulas (or entire theories) to avoid contradicting their ideology while ensuring experimental results in laboratories align approximately. This indicates that many formulas remain inaccurate and overly simplified, with numbers derived from laboratory observations to avoid contradicting their ideology rooted in the concept of individualism (Big Bang).
In my opinion, the most well-known and fundamental simplified formula in physics is , which speaks to energy, the primary foundation of our world. In my project, I often emphasize two absolute primary foundations of our world: energy and information. While energy represents the primary building block of the world, information connects it, serving as the main representative of feedback. When predicting the future, I will therefore focus primarily on these two aspects, energy and information. All other dimensions of progress (paths of development) stem from these two main aspects.
In today's world, the pursuit of energy sources is enormous. Our technology allows us to extract and process energy with limited efficiency—producing significant waste. Due to the imperfections in our extraction and recycling methods, combined with population growth and increasing consumption, our energy resources are gradually diminishing. Competition intensifies, waste accumulates, and this ultimately has a very negative impact on our environment. Discovering a new source of clean energy will be a pivotal moment in the development of humanity. Where can we find such a source? In nature. Attention must be focused either on the core of stars, the Earth's core (or the cores of planets), the core of galaxies, or the core of atoms. These represent different scales, but if we consider the possibility that the universe divides fractally (where the same pattern is observed at every scale), then the principles apply across all scales.
Let us consider the formula , which describes the relationship between energy and mass. But what role does the speed of light play in the equation? This raises another question: what is mass? We must recognize that the world is in constant motion. This is reflected in the law of energy, which states: energy is neither created nor destroyed; it merely transforms. Every moment is unique—everything moves, spins, and changes, seemingly at the speed of light. Why? This brings us to the problem of measuring speed. Speed can only be measured relative to something—a reference point such as Earth, the Sun, a road, the center of a galaxy, etc. It must always be within a closed system of measurement. Only within such systems do known formulas hold, because in reality, regardless of whether we realize it, we are all moving at extraordinarily high speeds. To our movement, we must add the rotational speed of Earth, the speed of the Sun moving around the galactic center, the speed of the galactic center around something else, and so on. Adding all these together could yield a number suggesting that we are moving at the speed of light.
Philosophical question: If everything moves at the speed of light, is anything really moving? Closed systems are crucial in our world; without them, the universe might appear as a blur, seemingly motionless. What constitutes a closed system in our world? Cores, sources of gravity—galactic cores, stellar cores, planetary cores, and atomic cores. The challenge of future human progress will be to correctly understand what happens at the core and replicate these processes. The realms of energy and information must be studied simultaneously, as they are closely intertwined. Information connects closed systems and modifies them.
In the project, I refer to autonomous units. What am I talking about? Look at us, at our organism, the human body. How many atoms does it consist of? How many closed systems? Yet, we function as a single whole—an informational entity bounded by our consciousness. From this perspective, the world indeed seems like consciousness: a space divided into countless spaces/consciousnesses at various scales. It is hypothesized that there is only one informational field/consciousness/space and that the diversity we perceive is caused by different positions in space, leading to unique experiences and perspectives. In other words, I hypothesize that if I were in your position, experiencing what you experience, I would behave exactly as you do. Conversely, if you were in my position, you would behave exactly as I do. Diversity in the world arises from varying positions (observed perspectives) and the "sizes" of autonomous units.
The world continuously expands, creating new spaces, new consciousnesses, new observation points, and accumulating new information in a collective database. This database subsequently influences all autonomous units included within it. Nothing in the world can be hidden—those who seek will find.
Let me return to the topic of information. As I mentioned, pure energy resides in the core. If we look into the core of a galaxy, we observe a massive black hole. Hypotheses suggest that if we understand black holes, we will also understand atomic nuclei, and vice versa. Observations of black holes reveal that they not only absorb matter (energy) but also "create" it "on the other side." It is hypothesized that black holes rotate at enormous speeds, generating massive electromagnetic fields and creating as much matter (energy) as they absorb. This process represents a kind of recycling mechanism for energy in our universe. The rotation is so intense that black holes appear two-dimensional on paper—like flattened rotating matrices. In the smallest scales, objects appear as one-dimensional points (pixels). However, I assume that these calculations are imprecise or distorted by the vast differences in observed scales. The universe creates three-dimensional bodies—spheres—at all scales.
To avoid discrepancies in observations, we created yet another natural science discipline—chemistry. When we look into the core of an atom, we again observe rotating particles (protons and neutrons), whose rotation generates a nuclear force that produces an electromagnetic field 100,000 times greater than the atom's core. This field defines the size of the entire atom, with its shell—comprising empty space and negatively charged electrons—exceeding the core by 100,000 times. The interaction between the positively charged core and negatively charged electrons is called electric force. Our world is electromagnetic.
I am not a scientist, but pioneers of the 19th and 20th centuries, like Nikola Tesla, could provide more insight on this topic. The similarity between the issues of black holes and atomic nuclei is no coincidence.
The first key technology of the future, which I believe is a source of clean energy, is the core. The challenge lies in understanding and replicating it. Disappointed? You might say that nuclear technology already exists and is applied in practice (e.g., nuclear power plants). Yes, but we are only at the beginning of this journey. Our power plants are in their infancy—first, second, perhaps third-generation advancements. They work by releasing energy from the nuclei of unstable isotopes (e.g., enriched uranium) through fission, which produces waste ("spent" fuel) that heats water into steam. This steam turns turbines, generating electricity. Our ultimate goal is to replicate core processes in such a way that we can generate and recycle energy simultaneously, making the process infinite and stable. In short, our goal is to emulate the functioning of black holes.
Industry in the future will become decentralized. Hand in hand with this technology, antigravity technology will emerge. Once we understand the electromagnetism of our world and obtain a source of clean energy from the core, all our intercity transportation vehicles will rise into the air. We will permanently solve the problem of ground infrastructure, which consumes vast energy resources for maintenance, burdens our environment, and poses significant issues for many animal species (autonomous units of a "lower category" compared to us). Each of us will have our own flying car with a perpetually full tank. We will begin exploring and "colonizing" space.
What exactly is antigravity? Is it just a myth, an imaginary technology from the film industry? No. To understand it, think of it as magnetism (like charges repel, opposite charges attract). Proof can be seen every evening in the sky—the Moon. Why doesn’t the Moon fall? Why doesn’t it drift away? Why doesn’t it rotate on its axis? The answer lies in the interaction between cores. Rotation in an atomic core creates gravity (nuclear force) with a constant positive charge. Two atoms naturally repel each other due to their positively charged cores and simultaneously attract each other through their negatively charged shells. However, in nature, the cores of atoms never fuse (under normal conditions).
The interaction between the core and the shell is called electricity, while the interaction between different cores and shells is called information. How does this relate to the Moon? Let’s ask further questions. Why do planets have orbits around their stars? Why do moons orbit planets? (Keep in mind that orbits are not ellipses but spirals—a more complex motion.) You might answer that this is due to the gravity of the Sun or planets, but then why don’t planets ever fall into the Sun, like water draining from a bathtub? Currently, we explain the formation of the solar system as the concentration of interstellar matter, with gas and dust collapsing under their own gravity to form the Sun at the center and planets orbiting it. But what if the reality is different—that all planets gradually formed from the Sun, and all stars (suns) formed gradually from the core of the galaxy (a black hole)? Do cores multiply?
Another scientific discipline that examines our world through the interactions of physics, chemistry, and consciousness is biology. In biology, the fundamental building block is the cell; in physics and chemistry, it is the core. Am I not writing about the same thing, just on a different scale? What if cores divide due to consciousness, similarly to cells dividing through mitosis or amitosis? In other words, is there a continuous process of division within cores? Of course, we must always consider the scale being observed because if we look at very large objects, the duration of division may seem infinite, while in very small objects, division may appear incredibly rapid (at the speed of light). Observations at extreme scales always risk distortion.
What if the cores of planets originated from the core of the Sun, and the cores of moons from the cores of planets? Let us not forget: energy is neither created nor destroyed; it only transforms. It is hypothesized that just as the Sun's core grows and the Sun itself expands, the cores of planets and the planets themselves grow. Stars and planets appear to be hollow. Numerous tests have been conducted (even shooting at the Moon), and it has been discovered that moons, planets, and even stars (like the Sun) resonate like bells. This property is related to the core and the shell, which is 100,000 times larger.
It seems that within the core of a star or planet, bodies rotate, continually generating energy/matter and storing it in the shell. The empty space between the core and the shell is caused by nuclear force. The shell of a planet or star expands continuously until it reaches a critical point where the core's gravitational force can no longer contain the accumulated matter in the shell. At this point, the shell ruptures, resulting in gas giants in the case of planets or supernovae in the case of stars. This process is driven by the differing rates of matter creation in the core and the "growth" of the core. Planetary cores grow more slowly and in a different manner. Occasionally, the rotating bodies within the core create a new rotating pair. The original core and the newly formed core repel each other (having the same positive charge), causing the new core to move toward the shell until it reaches a boundary and leaps outside the original core's shell. A new body with its own shell and orbit is created (a planet in the case of a star, or a moon in the case of a planet).
In the initial phase, the gravitational influence of the original core is still significant, preventing rotational movement in the shell of the newly formed core. This phase can also be observed in our Moon. The Moon does not fall to Earth due to electromagnetism, nor does it rotate or drift away due to Earth's gravitational influence. However, Earth and the Moon gradually move apart by about 4 cm annually. This value reflects the mutual differences in the growth of nuclear forces. Four centimeters may not seem significant, but growth is not linear. If you want to observe gravity in action, throw a stone into water. The ripples on the surface precisely illustrate gravity. Gravity acts in waves, meaning that cores move apart for a long time in a straight line until they reach a critical boundary and leap to the next gravitational "wave" of the original core.
At a certain moment, the body moves in a sudden leap. I believe that our planet's history records such "leaps" of Earth away from the Sun or the formation of our Moon. Consider, for example, the era of dinosaurs. Across the globe, we find fossils of these massive creatures. I ask: how was it possible for creatures tens of meters in size to live on Earth in the past? Life always adapts to its conditions and "starting" parameters.
In today's world, no land animal is heavier than an elephant, and in the oceans, no creature is larger than a whale (where gravity is modified by Archimedes' principle, allowing larger dimensions). The conditions on Earth must have been significantly different in the past. Gravitational force today is stronger than it was in the past. If you were to hypothetically stand a dinosaur from the past upright today, it wouldn't be able to move and would likely break its leg bones and collapse. Even if you tried to breed it from genetic material, it wouldn't grow beyond the weight of a modern elephant. Lower gravity in the past allowed life to grow to larger sizes, a period we call the "age of giants."
I hypothesize that lower gravity was due to the smaller size of Earth and its core. In the past, Earth had a solid shell and was shaped like a flattened sphere (similar to our Moon today). Over time, as Earth's core continuously created matter, the planet expanded. The solid shell cracked, and the gaps were filled with the ever-forming compound—water (forming seas and oceans). Earth grows, and its resources are limitless, though their renewal rate is restricted. Current industry focusing on gas and oil is appropriate. By extracting these resources, we release pressure from Earth's "pressure cooker," preventing open oil fields from polluting the environment.
If you were to shrink Earth to 30% of its current size, all continents would fit together, forming a solid crust. Earth would resemble a round rock. Dinosaurs serve as evidence of Earth's growth, and their sudden extinction is proof of a leap (a change in conditions). I hypothesize that at the time of the mass extinction of our giants, Earth's orbit leaped to a more distant position (a gravitational wave of the Sun). Whether the Moon formed during this time or slightly later, I cannot determine. I suspect that the Moon's formation is related to a different event in our history.
The Great Flood, documented in multiple sources, including the Old Testament, describes a time when the entire Earth was allegedly submerged in water. I associate this event with the ejection of a new core (the Moon) into orbit around Earth. The location from which this body "launched" into orbit may correspond to Earth's largest crater. The water that flooded the Earth was likely subterranean water expelled along with matter during the ejection, subsequently falling back onto the surface and inundating it. Part of this matter was partially captured by the Moon, while the rest fell back to Earth, creating tsunami waves.
It’s possible that I’m mistaken and the Moon may have formed earlier than the documented flood. The flood could also have been caused by another leap between orbital paths. It is difficult to judge these events from our current perspective. The important thing is to understand the principles of Earth's processes. Nothing is stable; everything changes and transforms. Our duty, to ensure the survival of our species, is to leave Earth as soon as possible because conditions on our planet will inevitably change, potentially leading us to the fate of the dinosaurs.
Understanding the principles of our electromagnetic world will help us quickly resolve our situation. We will be able to build massive spacecraft with their own gravity and electromagnetic fields. Initially, construction may take place in Earth's orbit and later in the Moon's orbit. This technology will finally allow us to leave Earth's surface and explore other planets. Permanent safety in the ever-changing universe can only be achieved through maneuverability.
As you can see, the potential of life technologies is immense. However, our future does not depend solely on possibilities; it primarily depends on us—conscious autonomous units—and our awareness. Information, collective databases, and the exchange of knowledge are critical factors for our future success or failure. It is essential to base our thinking on the correct concepts. Only then can we fully utilize our potential and achieve the desired utopia.
Every advanced technology can be used for "good" purposes but equally for "evil" ones. Until people gain awareness of collective importance and abandon the path of individualism, advanced technologies must remain hidden. A grenade does not belong in a monkey's hand. The potential power within the core is immense. Nikola Tesla understood these principles very well at the beginning of the 20th century. Imagine what the Second World War would have been like if his ideas had entered public life and he had become famous and respected in his time. Disastrous. Information is vital, but education must proceed gradually.
Today, we live in an era where we must begin using current technologies for our benefit. The Internet, a technology connecting minds, provides an opportunity for an initial awakening. Increasing data transmission speeds directly influence our thinking, utilization of the collective database, and exploration of new technologies.
The main future technology in the realm of information, in my opinion, is telepathy. If we do not destroy ourselves in the meantime, we will inevitably develop this ability, and our language will become obsolete. Today, our language is the greatest obstacle to mutual understanding. We are fragmented into too many groups that cannot understand one another. We are unable to collaborate effectively on a large scale. A wide range of languages is used worldwide, from the most primitive to the most complex. Although we have adopted one global language (English), it is among the more primitive ones. It is not easy to express complex ideas in it, let alone understand each other completely and accurately. Language limits not only understanding but also the speed of information exchange. It takes time to write something, time to say it, and time to comprehend it.
Telepathy would not only solve the problem of understanding but would also elevate the speed of information dissemination to a new level. Humanity would experience a leap in awareness, and different cultures would quickly equalize in their knowledge. Its development would confirm the theory of a connected world. Our current Wi-Fi network is the initial technology of telepathy. Complex future technologies can only be developed together. Autonomous units act as processors in our world, capable of processing data. The more interconnected they are, the greater their collective performance. "Two heads are better than one."
Predicting the future requires not only envisioning possibilities but also accurately assessing the temperament and nature of future populations and societies. Today, the world is deciding which path humanity will take. We are experiencing the last crisis of the old world. We feel enormous pressure from individualists striving to seize control of Earth. We sense their overwhelming need to reduce the population because they mistakenly believe the planet is overpopulated, and the only solution is to limit resource consumption. Their assumptions stem from a misunderstanding of the world and its principles.
Reducing the population would, after a few human generations, lead us back to the Middle Ages, halting technological progress and leaving us unprepared for a "leap." Humanity cannot sustain itself on this planet indefinitely. Our only future lies in cooperation, mutual support, and reaching for the stars. The coming decade will determine our success or failure. Personally, I am convinced that we will overcome the decisions of today's powerful madmen. Their actions will open many eyes. They already face strong competition globally. A bright future awaits us. In this century, we will reach the stars. Newly discovered energy sources will allow us to produce virtually anything in any quantity. A new societal order, based on the latest knowledge, will emerge.
Our vehicles will take to the skies, and we will forget about ground infrastructure forever. Roads, highways, and railways will be dismantled. A wide range of new technologies will emerge. Various autonomous units will pursue different paths; not all can be predicted. However, unity and understanding of the whole will connect us. We will comprehend mottos such as "One for all, and all for one." We will rehabilitate the planet's environment and eventually leave it behind. We will begin to explore infinity.
Juraj Tušš
