10/ POLITICS
It is the most popular topic in pubs every four years. Do you understand it? Of course, like everyone else. I would like to bring you a different view and analyze the topic in a bit more detail. If you understand the principle, you will orient yourself in politics very easily.
Before I begin, it is necessary to clarify the basic pillars on which the topic stands. It is necessary to know that on Earth we distinguish three kinds of policies. Global, foreign and domestic (state). I have written them in order from the most influential to the least influential. Global is the one whose power is exercised planet-wide regardless of lower forms of policies. Foreign policy is such when the power of a state is exercised on the territory of another state. Domestic policy is the one whose power is exercised within a concrete state. I often use the abstract word power – what is power? Power is the ability to manage applied in practice. Otherwise written, the ability to influence the environment and change it. The higher the quality with which you are able to manage/influence your surroundings, the greater power you hold in your hands. I outlined the management of society in previous articles. It is necessary to realize that in our world one cannot protect oneself from the influence of management. Either you manage, or you let yourself be managed. The property stems from the essence of our interconnected world. Politics should therefore be understood as the management of society, the management of a constantly changing field of energy.
On Earth currently (and already for a relatively long time) a “crowd-elitist” system of managing society functions. That is, there exists an elite whose task is to lead the crowd (less aware consciousnesses) on the path of development, on the path of enlightenment in various ways. You will certainly now be outraged and say to yourself what I am writing about, after all the elite that we can perceive in the world has the purpose only to suck us dry and skin us, what development, what enlightenment? You can object against the system, but if you think more deeply about the problem, you must acknowledge that it is an ideal form of development of less developed societies. What do I mean by that? At this moment one must realize further facts. Our society is relatively young, only recently the world connected (still not the whole/3.5 billion people do not have access to the network) with the help of an artificial network – the internet and we are able to share ideas over greater distances. Only recently we reached a population number that enables us to achieve better performance, utilize better performance and more efficiently use our technologies. Many consciousnesses in our society at present are still immature, do not understand management, are dependent on others/are managed by others. They look at the world still with animal optics, by direct observation, where it appears to them that the whole world revolves only around them. They cannot even explain the principle of functioning of “invisible” wifi – for example :D. Society lacks cadres, that is aware consciousnesses in sufficient number to participate in quality management of humanity. At the same time, society is pressed by “time”. From the natural course of things we have, as humanity, limited “time” of remaining on planet Earth and we can exhaust a limited amount of mineral resources simultaneously – so as not to burden the biosphere so much that it remains life-giving for us. The more our population increases, the more important the task of awareness of society is, with regard to resources it is more demanding and therefore we must take risks. The consequence of risk-taking caused that in the world we can recognize more kinds of elites (managing groups). Global, “human” and state elite. The global elite is the one that helps humanity in development from the beginning. Look for example at the period of the pharaohs. The “human” elite is represented by people who represent the most aware part of our species – humanity – it is relatively young, since only recently we reached the necessary technological progress to become aware of the basic principles of life. The state elite was created by the global elite in the period in which the world began (and had to) globalize (for achieving more efficient use of raw materials, for increasing the population on the planet/for increasing computational power). The state elite is represented by less aware people, people with animal type of psyche, the most capable of the incapable, the one-eyed among the blind. It significantly formed in the times of the British Empire, which colonized the world, the empire about which it used to be said that the sun does not set over it. Building international trade and the structure of multinational companies required the capacity of managing elites. It is obvious that global players either did not want to participate, or did not reach the necessary number for creating a planet-wide network of global firms, for creating a global economy. The “human” elite did not yet exist (in the sense of global understanding of things), and if so, then locally, and also only in small number. The state elite was trained with basic knowledge about management of society with the aim that it take over global trade, efficient handling of raw materials on planet Earth. The intention may be good, but in practice the goal did not quite succeed. Every single consciousness learns from its own mistakes, from its own experience. You can pass any exam, you can learn anything, until you gain the necessary practice, you will not become an expert. From day to day (from year to year) half-fools became people deciding about the redistribution of a greater part of raw materials on planet Earth. (Questionable whether the allowance did not occur intentionally, because in reality if you create sufficient contrast in the information field, you contribute more consciousnesses to see the correct direction.). The state elite was given into its hands power by an artificial globalization tool – money. According to its own awareness and partial training it set its own goals, which we can see in today’s world as those that cause problems for humanity.
For better understanding of the context and the issue, you must be acquainted with the following. Power in the crowd-elitist system of managing society is divided into: 1/ Conceptual power, 2/ Ideological power, 3/ Legislative power, 4/ Judicial power, 5/ Executive power. (Ordered from the most effective management to the least effective.)
1/ Conceptual power represents the management of society on an informational basis about the principle of functioning of our world. The absolute foundation from which in the information field one can rebound in two main directions. The first direction is individualism – that is understanding the world from one’s own angle of view, thus all those information about the beginning and end of the world, about the need to accumulate resources, animal seeing of the world, in which the opinion of “predator and prey” – animal law prevails. In short. The second direction is collectivism – that is understanding the world from the perspective of collective importance, the need for cooperation, all those information about the interconnected world etc. In short.
2/ Ideological power directly stems from the conceptual, so again it heads in two basic directions, only it further branches. It includes in itself all various ideologies, theories, considerations and information summarized into partial wholes, thus also religions. It reflects either from the conception of individualism (capitalism, liberalism,...), or from the conception of collectivism (socialism, communism,...). Of course there are many more of those ideologies, theories, religions, so that they encompass as large an area of contemporary thinking of inhabitants on planet Earth as possible. According to the level of awareness we incline to this or that ideology.
3/ Legislative power leans on ideologies so that it encompasses the most numerous group of adherents of current thinking. It is no coincidence if pre-election slogans seem to you created with the help of Google statistics :D. In less advanced countries, where in a person the animal type of psyche prevails, legislative power is established autocratically, without the need to lean on less or more complex ideas. Management is taken over directly and is managed directly by foreign policy. In more advanced countries with regularity a public opinion survey is organized, by which it is ascertained what ideology at the given time prevails in society – elections. On the basis of the result it is decided in what direction to lead society to further development. Since consciousnesses learn from their own experiences/from their own mistakes, strategies of development of society include in themselves also various forms of allowance, that is unfavorable development of events (wars, unrests, diseases, catastrophes).
4/ Judicial power supervises the observance of rules established by legislative power.
5/ Executive power fulfills by direct management the decisions of judicial and legislative power.
The first two types of power represent exclusively indirect management of society. They are the most effective form of management of society. If you believe the ideas, you yourself manage yourselves according to them. The remaining three types represent direct management of society. It is very operative management, however very prone to failure. Managing units (states) on the planet are divided according to conception, according to informational foundation. There is a group of states that belongs to the sphere of influence of the conception of individualism and there is a group of states that belongs to the sphere of influence of the conception of collectivism. Ideologically states need not be the same, however they have the same conceptual foundation. States do not decide for themselves (not every state is the same), on Earth so-called centers of concentration of management are created. Depending on technological sophistication, disposal of resources, and the number of adherents of the given conception, management concentrates in states (USA, UK, Russia, China ...) that are capacity-wise capable of global policy/global management. With the help of foreign policy (indirect management: diplomats and embassies/direct management: military bases) management is maintained also in less developed or smaller states that do not have the necessary resource stability. In the globalized world the state policy itself is therefore understood as the administration of a certain territory managed (with the help of foreign policy) by the dominant center of concentration of management. The effectiveness/stability of management with the help of this or that conception can be estimated depending on the number of adherents of the given conception in the given state. Elections are therefore for every group necessary and decisive, they are a litmus paper speaking about the state of society, eventually about the shift of the sphere of influence of the center of concentration of management.
If I therefore simplify the reality, the kinds of elites in the crowd-elitist system should be understood as follows: The global elite is the one that watches over the development of humanity, they are our teachers and according to need, according to the established strategy, they incline to one or the other side. They create contrast that enables us to see. The human elite is the desired result of development of society leaning on the conception of collectivism. The state elite is a group with partial knowledge leaning on the conception of individualism, concentrating on the resources of the planet, disposing of control over the artificial managing tool – money. The crowd are people with animal type of psyche, concentrating on basic instincts, without knowledge of their own importance, without knowledge about management of society, inclining to the conception of individualism.
The elite should be perceived as a transnational influence group of people. It does not act within a concrete state, concrete nation, but across all states/nations. In a state we consider as managing groups political parties. Parties leaning on this or that ideology. Parties represented by a crowd of various people, with various knowledge, parties that are represented by leaders from various kinds of elites. It is no exception if one party is represented by people from various elites, various ideologies and various conceptions. Purely reserved parties are few. Therefore politics should not be divided vertically (according to parties and factions), but horizontally (according to knowledge and influence/applied power). It does not depend on the party, but on the applied conception and the level of knowledge of concrete people. Precisely this fact confuses many people in deciding and in understanding the given politics. Many leaders in pre-election debates wave about with humanity, sincerity and the fight against evil, however when it comes to the crunch, they push a clear path of the opposite conception. It is therefore not unusual when politicians cover themselves with a foreign ideology and thus camouflage their own. An unaware person falls for them, however an aware one clearly recognizes them. It is not difficult to uncover them, it is enough if you concentrate your attention on their main used tool – money, numbers. Everyone who waves about with money, or numbers on virtual markets, is wealthy and dedicated his whole life to building his own “financial independence” – such a one still does not know much about life and pushes a clear path of the conception of individualism. You know the tree by its fruit, the old rule applies. Also the rule of splitness applies, a person cannot after all sit on two chairs, he always sits only on one. For how would a person look who holds the conception of individualism and at the same time the conception of collectivism? Hmm... You will not believe it, but on a larger scale after all one such social experiment exists in the world. It is the Jewish state. Chosen among nations, cooperating mainly within its own community. Diversity and variety of communities helps us in the development of the whole, however the only desired final result must be the understanding of the conception of collectivism across all communities. Only if we understand the interconnectedness of everything with everything, the sharing of information, if we understand the world as a constantly changing field of energy, information field, of which we are a direct extension, we will see our real potential and we will be able to achieve utopia. We must understand the saying that says: “Behave toward your enemy as if in the future he is to become your friend.” Politics is not as complicated as it seems. The task is to make aware/educate individual autonomous units/consciousnesses (educate people) in various ways with the help of their own experiences, so that they themselves understand the conception of collectivism/interconnected world. In the world we do not fight against evil, but against stupidity.
Why do I still think that the conception of individualism is inferior to the conception of collectivism? Is the situation not the opposite? Does not individualism represent the path of enlightenment, the path of progress and collectivism is only a utopian backward view? No, it is enough to understand that individualism is a deception. Yes, if you look at the world directly, you see only your view, your comfort, your possibilities, it may seem that in your life it depends only on you, however it is enough to think about what all you yourself are able to do during one day, what activities, what you are really able to produce and immediately it must be clear to you that your comfort stems from the cooperation of various people and not only from your exceptionality. If you want bread in the morning, if you want to be driven to work in the morning by car, if you want to dress nicely, all everyday details depend on cooperation within society. Bread, car, clothing, imagine that you would have to set about producing everything yourself. That would be comfort. Specialization is necessary, and with it is connected also the globalization of resources. It is no coincidence that in the world you can see various specialized parts. In one part extraction of resources takes place, in another production, in a third development of technologies, to a fourth part one goes to relax and rest.. The world is globalized and more efficiently utilized. Imagine a population of 7.8 billion that in every part would strive for its own self-sufficiency, for the fulfillment of all activities. Would it not be a waste of resources? Individualism stems from the misunderstanding of one’s own being. If someone thinks that humanity is finally technologically advanced for a comfortable life of the elite, however struggles with overpopulation and it is necessary to exterminate simple individuals so that only a billion or half a billion of truly reasonable ones remain disposing of sufficient resources for further development, such a person is also “damnably” mistaken. Precisely our number enables us to utilize higher performance. In the alternative in which a genocide of the population would be carried out and 7 billion people on the planet would be liquidated, an information deficit would occur, progress would stop, and with the next generation it would degrade. People would in time return back to the Middle Ages and not even contemporary robotization would help them, because with generations humanity would grow stupid and would not be able to utilize more complex technologies. The situation is similar to our brain, the more active nerve endings there are, the higher performance the brain delivers. Individualism is a bad habit from the animal kingdom, perhaps it is proof of inter-species reincarnation and development of consciousness in a longer horizon. The task of people is to mature from their animal past and move to the next level – to unity, to humanity. It is for us perspective to maintain exponential growth of the population, at the same time however our educational system must teach new generations to understanding, to cooperation, to the principles of functioning of the most modern technologies, so that they understand reality from the most modern knowledge and are able to autonomously manage/decide in life themselves. The current problem of growth is limited space and the limit in obtaining raw materials simultaneously. Ecology on the planet is in a horrible state, several species are threatened with extinction. It holds that the greater the diversity, the more beneficial the influence on the whole (more angles of view in obtaining experiences/information of the whole). You could have been witnesses last year of the theatrical announcing of this problem by Greta. This year we saw uncompromising restriction of production and throttling of the economy by global policy (corona crisis). We find ourselves on the edge of current possibilities. Again society must more globalize and kick itself to closer cooperation. It is necessary to realize that in the form of patents, licenses, and scientific grants, we are prevented from reaching a higher technological level of humanity. First we must learn mutuality, indeed further technologies enabling the solution of our current problems stem from the essence of functioning of our world. We will be able with them to obtain an enormous amount of energy, sufficient for the liquidation not only of our world. A grenade does not belong in the hand of a monkey. As long as in our politics the conception of collectivism does not prevail, until then the “referees” will choke us and cook us in our own juice. Further progress is not possible as long as we look at the world with animal optics. The “global players” will not allow it.
A favorite form of global players in the application of global policy is the entertainment industry. Music, films, sports... Often they leave us messages in works and change with them the information field. The truth is that these “tools” all kinds of elites try to use, the difference of politics is then visible in the final quality of the concrete work. With the help of the entertainment industry various ideas are instilled in people on the ideological level, fulfilling various goals in the management of society. For example a group of films was shot that shows us variants of our common future. If humanity succeeds and is able to make aware a greater part of its species, so that a different than crowd-elitist system of managing society arises, then our future will resemble the film Star Trek (exploration and travel through space). If it takes humanity too long to make aware broader masses, and we will still be managed by crowd-elitism, our future will resemble the film District 9 (on the planet zones will be established, according to awareness, which will differ by quality of life). If humanity fails in its development, the conception of individualism prevails and creates a conceptual unipolar world, then our future will resemble the film Mad Max (struggle for survival on an inhospitable planet).
At present the conception of individualism “fights” for its survival. As I mentioned above, for any conception to be sustainable, it needs resources. And those are running out. Especially on the western hemisphere. The economy of the west is created on a pyramid foundation. It functions as long as the influence of the conception of individualism is able to expand around the world. From newly obtained areas then in the form of its foreign policy it obtains resources for its functioning. Financial derivatives are the dream of various businessmen, however they have value only until it is found out that they have none. Since the conception is a representative mainly of direct management, its devastating effects are visible all over the world. Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Venezuela, Afghanistan, the whole of central Africa. Countries that are purposefully destroyed so that they submit to “higher” power. Fortunately a unipolar world did not succeed in being built in the past century. The conception of individualism is not the only one, and must deal with competition, with collectivism. While one side in the fight uses weapons, threats, censorship, economic sanctions (in the past encirclement and starvation of the given area was used), the other side uses primarily diplomacy, information, negotiation, concessions. The difference of level is evident. If the scales do not again tip to the side of individualism, as it was in the 50-60s of the past century, then I am convinced that we will succeed in maturing. Therefore one should not be backward, one should look forward!
When analyzing politics many people ask, until when are we to wait, until when are we to suffer, let us make a revolution right away. However, it is necessary to realize that you cannot force people by force to anything, not even to like each other. Direct management is the very last possibility of one’s defense. In vain you install aware people into the leadership of the country, as long as the majority of society itself does not become aware of the essence of being, until then you will not wait for any miracles. Therefore one must arm oneself with patience. Look how the attempts at establishing socialism after the Second World War ended. Cadres were lacking, and from the population no support came. One should look at the adherents of individualism as at children, they also make a pile of mistakes, but in the end they mature, their life experiences teach them to look at the world correctly. Sooner – or later. Every autonomous unit (every consciousness) hides in itself an unimaginable creative performance. We need every single consciousness for solving complex situations and challenges that we encounter in life. Even if they may seem to us at the moment as enemies, in reality they are our friends. We all have the same foundation. That is what collectivism is about. About the cooperation of all.
Juraj Tušš
